No Future: Smashwords Review

No Future

No Future

So what do you do if you’re an author and your book has just been given a thoughtful and thought-provoking review that is by no means complimentary?

Well, I could do the obvious: which is ignore it or pretend that the reviewer was in some sense misguided, but instead I would urge everyone who’s interested in my rather long dystopian novel No Future to read the review by Jim Bade and draw their own conclusions.

The review can be found on the following link:

So, in true New York Review of Books fashion, I shall address Jim Bane’s criticisms.

First of all, it’s not all negative. He does say the following:

Mr. Stoke has a definite gift for writing. His phrases and terminology are both apt and well chosen to convey the intended meanings of his story, plot and characters. I found the book fairly easy to read and only a few spelling and grammatical errors. Not bad at all for a self published book.

And also since I’m pretty sure that I’m not “an over educated, narcissistic, foul mouthed, sex obsessed, drug addict with a paranoid irrational dislike of authority and a total lack of faith in humanity“, I guess I must therefore be what Jim describes as “just the opposite and one hell of a writer“. In fact, if I had no faith in humanity, I don’t think I’d ever write something which is intended to somehow counter its worst vices.

I’m no fan of any of “Isaac Asimov to James Michener to Tom Clancy to Danielle Steele“, although since I’ve not really read of any these writers I’m not saying that’s because I wouldn’t like their fiction if I did read them.

However, the main thrust of the criticism is that the whole enterprise is flawed by being unrelentingly pessimistic and even misanthropic. Jim says: “there was not one character that I could identify with. ALL of them were sex and drug obsessed, most of them swore in every sentence, most of them were hypocritical in an almost extreme sense, and oddest of all, most of the characters were very well educated, though pretty much every one of the female characters eventually became prostitutes and the men Johns. I guess my point is that nearly none of them were what most people would consider normal. None of them, to me, were people I would wish to be friends with.

This is criticism I won’t even try to counter. I think it’s absolutely spot on because it does highlight exactly the kind of people dealt with in the novel. These are not generally ordinary people in the normal sense of the word, although in their own milieu they would probably be considered normal enough. The most normal people, such as Alex, are pretty much flawed and the most moral people, with the exceptions of Roland and Diane, have to make unpalatable decisions to survive.

I can’t directly thank Jim Bade (as he doesn’t publish his e-mail address), but I would like to say that I am genuinely very grateful for his review and I hope he reviews my other novels.

However, although No Future is probably the most misanthropic and unpleasant of my novels, I suspect there is enough in almost all my novels that Jim will not like.

And for this I can only apologise.


3 thoughts on “No Future: Smashwords Review

  1. I recognize the prissy reaction to “No Future” since I’ve run into it with my own work. There is an insidious school of thought in the U.S. which holds that fiction should always teach an uplifting little lesson reinforcing “the American myth”. For those people the only acceptable stance for writers is to reinforce the aesthetics of sweetness and light; to reinforce current notions of morality, provide us with proteges with whom we can identify, and always foster the delusion of the inevitable triumph of good over evil.
    Anais Nin said that the role of the writer is not to say what we all can say, but what we are unable to say…


    • Hello Bradley- I hope my words were helpful. I not misanthropic, and I don’t imagine your being so either. There’s a Greek song that sings about our lives as being sullied by the “smoke and soot” of living. The eyes of the self-righteous, often over look the flame.


  2. Pingback: Beef | Bradley Stoke

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s