No Future: Smashwords Review Riposte

No Future

No Future

You may have noticed the kind comments by Wynn Parks in which he defended my novel No Future from the negative review given for it by Jim Bade in Smashwords.

Wynn’s defence is based on the view that readers in America expect their fiction to ‘always teach an uplifting little lesson reinforcing “the American myth”. For those people the only acceptable stance for writers is to reinforce the aesthetics of sweetness and light; to reinforce current notions of morality, provide us with protégés with whom we can identify, and always foster the delusion of the inevitable triumph of good over evil.’ He believes, as I do, that fiction should be more than a means to reinforce a conventional uncritical view of the world.

However, in defence of Jim Bade, I’ll say that I am grateful for any review that is an honest and intelligent account of my fiction however much I disagree with it.

And I shall also add that I don’t believe that America has a monopoly of the view that fiction should always be fluffy and affirmative. A great deal of American fiction, as also film, theatre and television, has a much more interesting view of the world than that, but just as in the UK and every other country I know at all well, the predominant fiction celebrates only a narrow set of values and is expected to be ultimately life-affirming and perhaps somewhat bland.

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s